![]() ![]() ![]() Your limit will be resources, the hard limit on older versions of Hyper-V were in the ranges of 512-2048 based on version and edition, I don't believe MS publishes limits to Hyper-V for current versions. There are threads about this, and I've explicitly asked the old MS rep here, and he confirmed VDI and SA are only necessary if you're doing remote access to client VMs. It's only when you're remotely accessing client OSes that you need to deal with VDA/VDI licensing. You can virtualize desktop OSes like Windows 7 and 10 and not need a VDA license if you're accessing them directly on the same host, in other words, from the console of the hosting Windows 10 computer. Your above question assumes you are using Hyper-V this one goes against that, but use whatever you are comfortable with, Hyper-V (Type-1 Hypervisor) or VMware Workstation (type-2 hypervisor).ġ is free and there for you to use already, one costs money and is an application, however many people use VMware because of familiarity, both function the same, but somewhat differently. Which hypervisor would you recommend? Mainly I'm wondering if Hyper-V would have a less of a footprint on the host. I do not believe there is a limit, it's based on licenses of the guests, but Hyper-V on a workstation exists for dev/test use not aimed at production use, so MSDN/TechNet type use, the limit is your resources. How many Windows Hyper-V clients can run on a Windows 10 host (not resource-wise but according to MS restrictions, assuming they exist)?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |